<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</description>
        <dc:date>2010-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/6/1/8" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/4">
        <title>PCEP enhances IgA mucosal immune responses in mice following different immunization routes with influenza virus antigens</title>
        <description>Background:
We previously demonstrated that polyphosphazenes, particularly PCEP, enhance immune responses in mice immunized subcutaneously and intranasally. The objective of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of polyphosphazenes as adjuvants when delivered through different routes of vaccine administration.
Methods:
BALB/c mice were immunized through intranasal, subcutaneous, oral and intrarectal delivery with vaccine formulations containing either influenza X:31 antigen alone or formulated in PCEP. Serum and mucosal washes were collected and assayed for antigen-specific antibody responses by ELISA, while splenocytes were assayed for antigen-specific cytokine production by ELISPOT.
Results:
Intranasal immunization with PCEP+X:31 induced significantly higher IgA titers in all mucosal secretions (lung, nasal, and vaginal) compared to the other routes. Serum analysis showed that all mice given the PCEP+X:31 combination showed evidence of enhanced IgG2a titers in all administered routes, indicating that PCEP can be effective as an adjuvant in enhancing systemic immune responses when delivered via different routes of administration.
Conclusions:
We conclude that PCEP is a potent and versatile mucosal adjuvant that can be administered in a variety of routes and effectively enhances systemic and local immune responses. Furthermore, intranasal immunization was found to be the best administration route for enhancing IgA titers, providing further evidence for the potential of PCEP as a mucosal adjuvant.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Nelson Eng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Srinivas Garlapati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Volker Gerdts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorne Babiuk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Mutwiri</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2010, 8:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-8-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/3">
        <title>Assessment of immune response to repeat stimulation with BCG vaccine using in vitro PBMC model  </title>
        <description>Background:
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most prevalent cause of death due to a single pathogen. Bacillus Calmette Gu&#233;rin (BCG) is the only vaccine available for clinical use that protects against miliary TB; however, this vaccine has shown variable levels of efficacy against pulmonary TB. In India, a single dose of BCG vaccine is given and there are few countries where repeated doses of BCG are given. The incidence of TB in India is very high inspite of primary vaccination in neonatal period and therefore requires consideration for repeated immunization.
Methods:
To improve BCG immunogenicity, we have evaluated specific antimycobacterial immune responses (anti-BCG IgG and IFN-&#947;), T cell activity-ADA, CD4 and CD8 T cell count, and CD4/CD8 ratio in a peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) model using boost immunization protocols with the BCG vaccine. PBMC were induced with a repeat dose of BCG at 24 and 72 hrs of cell culture.
Results:
At the end of the experimental time, supernatant was collected to estimate anti-BCG IgG titer, interferon &#947;, ADA activity, CD 4 and CD8 T cell count, and CD4/CD8 ratio. We demonstrated that PBMC induced with a repeat dose of BCG showed an increased specific anti-mycobacterial immune responses, T cell activity, and ADA activity as compared to PBMC induced with BCG alone or without BCG induction.
Conclusion:
The repeat BCG stimulation of PBMC obtained from BCG vaccinated individuals shows enhanced immune activation with respect to increased anti-BCG titre, IFN-&#947; and ADA activity without concomitant increase in CD4 and CD8 cells. This study provides some basic data in future experiments in animal models with respect to repeat BCG vaccination.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Rajpal Kashyap</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aliabbas Husain</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shweta Morey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Milind Panchbhai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Poonam Deshpande</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hemant Purohit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Girdhar Taori</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hatim Daginawala</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2010, 8:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-8-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/2">
        <title>CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides protect mice from Burkholderia pseudomallei but not Francisella tularensis Schu S4 aerosols.</title>
        <description>Studies have shown that CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODN) protect mice from various bacterial pathogens, including Burkholderia pseudomallei and Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS), when administered before parenteral challenge. Given the potential to develop CpG ODN as a pre-treatment for multiple bacterial biological warfare agents, we examined survival, histopathology, and cytokine data from CpG ODN-treated C57BL/6 mice to determine whether previously-reported protection extended to aerosolized B. pseudomallei 1026b and highly virulent F. tularensis Schu S4 infections. We found that, although CpG ODN protected mice from aerosolized B. pseudomallei challenges, the immunostimulant failed to benefit the animals exposed to F. tularensis Schu S4 aerosols. Our results, which contrast with earlier F. tularensis LVS studies, highlight potential differences in Francisella species pathogenesis and underscore the need to evaluate immunotherapies against human pathogenic species.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>David Rozak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Herbert Gelhaus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mojgan Zadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Louis Huzella</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Waag</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeffrey Adamovicz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2010, 8:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-8-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/1">
        <title>CD40mAb adjuvant induces a rapid antibody response that may be beneficial in post-exposure prophylaxis</title>
        <description>Active vaccination can be effective as a post-exposure prophylaxis, but the rapidity of the immune response induced, relative to the incubation time of the pathogen, is critical. We show here that CD40mAb conjugated to antigen induces a more rapid specific antibody response than currently used immunological adjuvants, alum and monophosphoryl lipid A&#8482;.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/8/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Vijay Bhagawati-Prasad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evy DeLeenheer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nadine Keefe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorna Ryan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Carlring</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Heath</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2010, 8:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-8-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/5">
        <title>HIV-1 neutralization by monoclonal antibody against conserved region 2 and patterns of epitope exposure on the surface of native viruses</title>
        <description>Background:
Conserved neutralizing epitopes are considered to be a key role for eliciting broadly neutralizing antibody (NAb). Previously, two conserved neutralizing epitopes of HIV-1 CRF01_AE envelope were identified at amino acid 93-112 of the C1 (C1E) and at 218-239 of the C2 (C2E) regions. To access the potency of antibody directed against conserved epitopes, a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific to the C2E region was developed and characterized.
Methods:
The immunogenicity of two epitopes was examined by immunizing BALB/c mice with the matching synthetic peptides. One MAb, C2EB5, directed against peptide C2E, was generated by conventional methods, while C1E1 and C1E2 peptides induced slight antibody response in mice. The neutralizing activity of MAb C2EB5 was examined using a peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) based method and various HIV-1 subtypes including A, B, C, D, and CRF01_AE; C2EB5 was compared with other known neutralizing MAbs (4E10, 447-52D) and with sCD4. The exposure of the C2 epitope on native virus was investigated using virus capture by these MAbs.
Results:
The MAb C2EB5 demonstrated cross-neutralization against various HIV-1 subtypes. The overall potency of MAb C2EB5 against 5 subtypes was ranked in the following order: subtype C&gt; CRF01_AE&gt; subtype D&gt; subtype A&gt; subtype B. The epitope exposure for MAb C2EB5 was also correlated with the neutralization properties of each subtype.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates the cross-clade neutralizing activity of a MAb directed against an epitope located in the C2 region of the HIV-1 env and highlights differences in the exposure of antigenic epitopes on the surface of various HIV-1 subtypes. The epitope for this newly identified neutralizing MAb made against a subtype CRF01_AE peptide is particularly exposed in subtype C viral isolates.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Apichai Sreepian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jongruk Permmongkol</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wannee Kantakamalakul</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sontana Siritantikorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nattaya Tanlieng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ruengpung Sutthent</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2009, 7:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-7-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/4">
        <title>DNA vaccine containing the mycobacterial hsp65 gene prevented insulitis in MLD-STZ diabetes </title>
        <description>Background:
Our group previously demonstrated that a DNA plasmid encoding the mycobacterial 65-kDa heat shock protein (DNA-HSP65) displayed prophylactic and therapeutic effect in a mice model for tuberculosis. This protection was attributed to induction of a strong cellular immunity against HSP65. As specific immunity to HSP60 family has been detected in arthritis, multiple sclerosis and diabetes, the vaccination procedure with DNA-HSP65 could induce a cross-reactive immune response that could trigger or worsen these autoimmune diseases.
Methods:
In this investigation was evaluated the effect of a previous vaccination with DNA-HSP65 on diabetes development induced by Streptozotocin (STZ). C57BL/6 mice received three vaccine doses or the corresponding empty vector and were then injected with multiple low doses of STZ.
Results:
DNA-HSP65 vaccination protected mice from STZ induced insulitis and this was associated with higher production of IL-10 in spleen and also in the islets. This protective effect was also concomitant with the appearance of a regulatory cell population in the spleen and a decreased infiltration of the islets by T CD8+ lymphocytes. The vector (DNAv) also determined immunomodulation but its protective effect against insulitis was very discrete.
Conclusion:
The data presented in this study encourages a further investigation in the regulatory potential of the DNA-HSP65 construct. Our findings have important implications for the development of new immune therapy strategies to combat autoimmune diseases.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Rubens Santos-Junior</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandrina Sartori</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deison Lima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Souza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arlete Coelho-Castelo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vania Bonato</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Celio Silva</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2009, 7:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-7-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/3">
        <title>Prospects for control of emerging infectious diseases with plasmid DNA vaccines </title>
        <description>Experiments almost 20 years ago demonstrated that injections of a sequence of DNA encoding part of a pathogen could stimulate immunity. It was soon realized that &quot;DNA vaccination&quot; had numerous potential advantages over conventional vaccine approaches including inherent safety and a more rapid production time. These and other attributes make DNA vaccines ideal for development against emerging pathogens. Recent advances in optimizing various aspects of DNA vaccination have accelerated this approach from concept to reality in contemporary human trials. Although not yet licensed for human use, several DNA vaccines have now been approved for animal health indications. The rapid manufacturing capabilities of DNA vaccines may be particularly important for emerging infectious diseases including the current novel H1N1 Influenza A pandemic, where pre-existing immunity is limited. Because of recent advances in DNA vaccination, this approach has the potential to be a powerful new weapon in protecting against emerging and potentially pandemic human pathogens.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Ronald Moss</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2009, 7:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-7-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>The first influenza pandemic in the new millennium:  lessons learned hitherto for current control efforts and overall pandemic preparedness</title>
        <description>Influenza viruses pose a permanent threat to human populations due to their ability to constantly adapt to impact immunologically susceptible individuals in the forms of epidemic and pandemics through antigenic drifts and antigenic shifts, respectively. Pandemic influenza preparedness is a critical step in responding to future influenza outbreaks. In this regard, responding to the current pandemic and preparing for future ones requires critical planning for the early phases where there is no availability of pandemic vaccine with rapid deployment of medical supplies for personal protection, antivirals, antibiotics and social distancing measures. In addition, it has become clear that responding to the current pandemic or preparing for future ones, nation states need to develop or strengthen their laboratory capability for influenza diagnosis as well as begin preparing their vaccine/antiviral deployment plans. Vaccine deployment plans are the critical missing link in pandemic preparedness and response. Rapid containment efforts are not effective and instead mitigation efforts should lead pandemic control efforts. We suggest that development of vaccine/antiviral deployment plans is a key preparedness step that allows nations identify logistic gaps in their response capacity.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Franco-Paredes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Carrasco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jose Ignacio Santos-Preciado</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2009, 7:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-7-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/1">
        <title>Evaluation of recombinant invasive, non-pathogenic Eschericia coli as a vaccine vector against the intracellular pathogen, Brucella</title>
        <description>Background:
There is no safe, effective human vaccine against brucellosis. Live attenuated Brucella strains are widely used to vaccinate animals. However these live Brucella vaccines can cause disease and are unsafe for humans. Killed Brucella or subunit vaccines are not effective in eliciting long term protection. In this study, we evaluate an approach using a live, non-pathogenic bacteria (E. coli) genetically engineered to mimic the brucellae pathway of infection and present antigens for an appropriate cytolitic T cell response.
Methods:
E. coli was modified to express invasin of Yersinia and listerialysin O (LLO) of Listeria to impart the necessary infectivity and antigen releasing traits of the intracellular pathogen, Brucella. This modified E. coli was considered our vaccine delivery system and was engineered to express Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) or Brucella antigens for in vitro and in vivo immunological studies including cytokine profiling and cytotoxicity assays.
Results:
The E. coli vaccine vector was able to infect all cells tested and efficiently deliver therapeutics to the host cell. Using GFP as antigen, we demonstrate that the E. coli vaccine vector elicits a Th1 cytokine profile in both primary and secondary immune responses. Additionally, using this vector to deliver a Brucella antigen, we demonstrate the ability of the E. coli vaccine vector to induce specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs).
Conclusion:
Protection against most intracellular bacterial pathogens can be obtained mostly through cell mediated immunity. Data presented here suggest modified E. coli can be used as a vaccine vector for delivery of antigens and therapeutics mimicking the infection of the pathogen and inducing cell mediated immunity to that pathogen.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/7/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Jerome Harms</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marina Durward</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diogo Magnani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Splitter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2009, 7:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-7-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/6/1/8">
        <title>Vaccine based on a ubiquitous cysteinyl protease and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A protects against Streptococcus pyogenes sepsis and toxic shock</title>
        <description>Background:
The gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes is a common pathogen of humans that causes invasive infections, toxic-shock syndrome, rheumatic fever, necrotizing fasciitis and other diseases. Detection of antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates has renewed interest in development of new vaccine approaches for control S. pyogenes sepsis. In the study presented, a novel protein vaccine was examined. The vaccine was based on a recombinant protein fusion between streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B (SpeB), a cysteinyl protease expressed by all clinical isolates, and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SpeA), a superantigen produced by a large subset of isolates.
Results:
A novel protein was produced by mutating the catalytic site of SpeB and the receptor binding surface of SpeA in a fusion of the two polypeptides. Vaccination of HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice with the SpeA-SpeB fusion protein protected against a challenge with the wild-type SpeA that was lethal to na&#239;ve controls, and vaccinated mice were protected from an otherwise lethal S. pyogenes infection.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that the genetically attenuated SpeA-SpeB fusion protein may be useful for controlling S. pyogenes infections. Vaccination with the SpeA-SpeB fusion protein described in this study may potentially result in protective immunity against multiple isolates of S. pyogenes due to the extensive antibody cross-reactivity previously observed among all sequence variants of SpeB and the high frequency of SpeA-producing strains.</description>
        <link>http://www.jibtherapies.com/content/6/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Robert Ulrich</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 2008, 6:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-8518-6-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-8518</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-10-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
